GoodIdxThe Goodness Index
AB Electrolux (publ)

AB Electrolux (publ)

Global household appliance manufacturer

SwedenFounded 1919Appliance Manufacturing, Consumer Durables, Industrial Design, Sustainability Reporting, Product Safety, Global Supply Chains, and Labor Restructuring
58
MIXED

of 100 · stable trend · Some good traits but inconsistent

Standing

58/100

Raw Score

49/85

Confidence

74%

Evidence

Broad

About

Electrolux is a century-old Swedish appliance group with durable public benefit through household technology, design, and energy-efficiency work, alongside significant product-safety and labor-pressure concerns.

The institution shows a real, documented sustainability and governance framework, broad consumer reach, and repeated product-efficiency commitments. Its alignment is moderated by regulatory safety failures, recurring recalls, financial pressure, and current restructuring that affects workers.

Five Pillars

Pillar scores (0–100%)

Core Worldview40%(10/25)
Contribution to Others47%(14/30)
Personal Discipline80%(8/10)
Reliability100%(8/5)
Stability Under Pressure60%(9/15)

Strong documented sustainability and governance architecture and durable product utility are moderated by repeated safety recalls, a DOJ/CPSC reporting-delay penalty, and major labor restructuring.

Goodness over time

Starts at 100 at birth, natural decay after accountability age, timeline events adjust the trajectory.

17 Criteria Scores

Individual item scores (0–5) with evidence notes

Core Worldview

Stated moral framework4/5

Purpose and sustainability materials frame the business around better living, resource efficiency, and social responsibility.

Stakeholder orientation3/5

Reporting addresses consumers, workers, suppliers, communities, and shareholders, but financial pressure and recalls complicate stakeholder balance.

Accountability language3/5

Code, governance, and sustainability reports provide explicit accountability language, with mixed evidence when safety reporting failed.

Contribution to Others

Customer and product benefit3/5

Appliances create household utility and efficiency benefits, but safety incidents and recalls reduce the score.

Worker and community impact2/5

Global employment and local economic value are material, while recent Italy layoffs and plant closure plans show serious worker-impact pressure.

Environmental stewardship4/5

Long-running environmental reporting, energy-efficiency work, and net-zero goals are well documented.

Supply chain responsibility3/5

Supplier standards and human-rights due-diligence commitments exist; outcome evidence is meaningful but incomplete.

Consumer safety2/5

Repeated range recalls and a prior delayed hazard-reporting settlement materially weaken consumer-safety performance.

Personal Discipline

Ethical discipline3/5

The company has visible compliance, ethics, and reporting systems but has not always met the discipline expected in hazard disclosure.

Principled restraint2/5

Commercial growth, restructuring, and recall history show restraint is uneven under market pressure.

Charitable or social obligation3/5

Food Foundation and Better Living programming indicate social obligation, though evidence is more programmatic than transformative.

Reliability

Governance transparency4/5

Public-company governance, annual reporting, sustainability statements, and code materials provide substantial transparency.

Compliance and disclosure2/5

The 2014 DOJ/CPSC settlement for delayed safety reporting is a direct integrity concern.

Promise follow through2/5

Recall remedies and sustainability goals show follow-through mechanisms, but repeated safety recalls and unresolved labor pressures keep this cautious.

Stability Under Pressure

Capacity for correction3/5

The company uses recalls, CPSC processes, sustainability frameworks, and governance updates to respond, but correction has been reactive in significant safety matters.

Pressure behavior2/5

Recent financial and demand pressure has translated into major restructuring plans affecting workers.

Long term adaptation4/5

A century of adaptation across products, regions, and sustainability requirements supports a stronger long-term resilience score.

Timeline

Key events and documented turning points

1919

Electrolux founded in Stockholm

Electrolux Group was founded in Stockholm by Axel Wenner-Gren, establishing the institution that became a global appliance company.

Created a durable industrial platform for household appliances.

high
1925

Launch of first absorption fridge

Electrolux records the 1925 launch of its first absorption fridge, bringing fresh-food storage into the home-appliance story.

Advanced everyday domestic convenience and food preservation.

medium
1959

Dishwasher and combined fridge-freezer launches

The official history records a 1959 benchtop dishwasher and first combined fridge-freezer launch, expanding the companys domestic technology impact.

Broadened household labor-saving and food-storage capabilities.

medium
1995

Long-running environmental and sustainability reporting

Electrolux maintains an archive of environmental and sustainability reports stretching back to the mid-1990s and current reporting with a net-zero value-chain target by 2050.

Created a recurring public accountability framework for environmental and social performance.

high
2014

DOJ civil penalty for delayed hazard reporting

The U.S. Department of Justice announced that Electrolux Home Products agreed to pay a $750,000 civil penalty to settle allegations it failed to immediately report an oven hazard to CPSC.

Settlement required payment and product-safety compliance recordkeeping and monitoring systems.

high
2024

CPSC reannounces Frigidaire and Kenmore range recall

CPSC reannounced a recall of about 203,000 ranges due to fire and burn hazards after continued reports of erratic range behavior, fires, and injuries.

Repair/refund pathways were published, but the reannouncement indicates a long-running remedy and safety issue.

high
2026

CPSC gas-range recall after burn injuries

CPSC announced a recall of about 174,800 Frigidaire gas ranges after delayed ignition reports and burn injuries.

Free in-home repair process announced; incident count keeps consumer-safety concern active.

high
2026

Reported Italy layoffs and plant closure plan

ANSA and Reuters-carried reporting described plans for about 1,700 layoffs out of 4,500 Italian employees and closure of the Cerreto d Esi plant, with government and union attention to the dispute.

Restructuring response remains unresolved; it is a major social-care and resilience pressure test.

high

Pressure Tests

Behavior under crisis or scrutiny

DOJ/CPSC delayed hazard-reporting penalty

2014

Electrolux Home Products agreed to pay a civil penalty over allegations it did not immediately report an oven hazard to CPSC.

Response: The settlement included a compliance program, internal recordkeeping, and monitoring systems for product-safety hazard information.

orange

Frigidaire and Kenmore range recall reannouncement

2024

CPSC reannounced a recall covering about 203,000 ranges after reports of erratic operation, fires, and injuries.

Response: Electrolux provided repair/refund pathways and consumer contact channels, but the reannouncement shows a long-running safety-remedy challenge.

orange

Italian restructuring and layoffs

2026

Reporting described plans for about 1,700 layoffs and closure of the Cerreto d Esi plant amid weak demand and cost pressure.

Response: Government and union discussions were reported; worker-protection outcomes remain unresolved as of this profile.

yellow

Progression

current stage

2014-2026: Consumer-safety reporting failures, recalls, and restructuring pressures keep the current profile mixed and require ongoing evidence review.

unstable

early years

1919-1959: From vacuum cleaners to refrigerators, washing machines, and dishwashers, Electrolux helped normalize household technologies that changed everyday domestic labor.

improving

growth years

1995-2026: Environmental and sustainability reporting became a recurring public discipline, later joined by net-zero value-chain targets and formal codes.

improving

Behavioral Patterns

Positive

  • Durable household-product innovation and global availability.
  • Documented sustainability reporting and climate/resource-efficiency commitments.
  • Formal governance, ethics, workplace, and supplier policy architecture.

Concerns

  • Safety reporting and recall performance has produced regulatory and consumer-protection concerns.
  • Restructuring and layoffs can externalize financial pressure onto workers and local communities.
  • Commercial claims about better living require stronger proof in repair, remedy, and product safety outcomes.

Evidence Quality

6

Strong

3

Medium

0

Weak

Overall: broad

This profile evaluates observable institutional behavior only, not hidden intention or private belief.