GoodIdxThe Goodness Index
Marjorie Taylor Greene

Marjorie Taylor Greene

Former U.S. Representative for Georgia's 14th district

United StatespoliticianU.S. House of RepresentativesHouse Republican Conference
30
LOW

of 100 · declining trend · Some good traits but inconsistent

Standing

30/100

Raw Score

29/85

Confidence

82%

Evidence

Strong

About

Greene built a durable national profile through combative congressional politics and repeated confrontation. The strongest evidence points to resilience and some constituency-facing advocacy, but the heavier pattern is r

The observable record is shaped much more by controversy and institutional disruption than by steady public care. Her best evidence comes from persistence under pressure and occasional survivor-centered advocacy; her worst evidence is repea

Five Pillars

Pillar scores (0–100%)

Core Worldview48%(12/25)
Contribution to Others13%(4/30)
Personal Discipline20%(2/10)
Reliability0%(0/5)
Stability Under Pressure73%(11/15)

The observable record is shaped much more by controversy and institutional disruption than by steady public care. Her best evidence comes from persistence under pressure and occasional survivor-centered advocacy; her worst evidence is repea

17 Criteria Scores

Individual item scores (0–5) with evidence notes

Core Worldview

Belief in unseen order2/5
Belief in revealed guidance2/5
Belief in prophets as examples2/5
Belief in accountability last day3/5
Belief in god3/5

Contribution to Others

Helps relatives1/5
Helps the poor or stuck1/5
Helps people who ask directly1/5
Helps free people from constraint1/5
Helps orphans or unsupported young people0/5
Helps travelers strangers or cut off people0/5

Personal Discipline

Prays consistently1/5
Gives obligatory charity1/5

Reliability

Keeps promises agreements contracts commitments and clear communication0/5

Stability Under Pressure

Patient during personal hardship4/5
Patient during financial difficulty3/5
Patient during conflict pressure fear or battlefield moments4/5

Timeline

Key events and documented turning points

2021

House removed Greene from committee assignments

The House passed H.Res.72 removing Greene from committee assignments after scrutiny of past statements and conduct.

Formal congressional sanction reduced her committee role.

high
2022

Won Republican primary in Georgia despite national controversy

Greene survived a contested primary and maintained strong support in her district.

Advanced to the general election and preserved political viability.

medium
2024

Filed motion to vacate Speaker Mike Johnson

Greene initiated a formal effort to remove the sitting House speaker.

Triggered a leadership confrontation and national scrutiny.

high
2024

Bid to remove the speaker failed on the House floor

The House tabled Greene’s motion to vacate, leaving Johnson in place.

The effort failed and weakened Greene’s leverage.

medium
2024

Won reelection in Georgia’s 14th district

AP called Greene’s reelection victory in the 2024 general election.

Returned to Congress for another term before later resigning.

medium

Pressure Tests

Behavior under crisis or scrutiny

2022 primary pressure

2022

Entered a contested primary under intense national scrutiny.

Response: Stayed combative and preserved district support.

strong resilience but polarizing leadership style

2024 speaker fight

2024

Forced a confrontation with the House speaker and lost.

Response: Followed through procedurally but deepened instability.

low integrity under power pressure

Progression

crisis years

Sanctions and procedural fights sharpened reliability concerns.

declining

current stage

Public legacy is dominated by controversy more than service delivery.

declining

early years

Rapid rise through grievance-focused politics.

upward

growth years

Nationalized influence through conflict and media attention.

upward

Behavioral Patterns

Positive

  • Keeps political momentum under heavy criticism
  • Occasionally centers victims in public advocacy

Concerns

  • Repeated integrity controversies and sanctions
  • High willingness to inflame conflict for leverage

Evidence Quality

8

Strong

1

Medium

0

Weak

Overall: strong

This profile evaluates observable public behavior and evidence, not the state of a person’s soul.