GoodIdxThe Goodness Index
NU

National University of Asunción

Public research university

ParaguayFounded 1889Higher Education and Research
63
MIXED

of 100 · stable trend · Visibly decent and improving

Standing

63/100

Raw Score

53/85

Confidence

74%

Evidence

Broad

About

Paraguay's oldest and largest public university combines major educational reach, visible public-service language, and stronger transparency architecture with a still-mixed integrity record shaped by the 2015 corruption crisis and later faculty-level governance disputes.

The National University of Asunción reads as a socially valuable institution with high national educational impact, meaningful public-accountability signals, and credible civic resilience, but its integrity remains only moderate because repeated corruption and transparency controversies have not fully disappeared from the public record.

Five Pillars

Pillar scores (0–100%)

Core Worldview52%(13/25)
Contribution to Others73%(22/30)
Personal Discipline40%(4/10)
Reliability60%(3/5)
Stability Under Pressure73%(11/15)

UNA scores strongest on social contribution and resilience, moderately on moral-accountability foundation, and more cautiously on integrity because the public record still carries major corruption and faculty-governance controversies.

Goodness over time

Starts at 100 at birth, natural decay after accountability age, timeline events adjust the trajectory.

17 Criteria Scores

Individual item scores (0–5) with evidence notes

Core Worldview

Belief in god1/5

UNA is a secular public university and does not publicly ground its mission in explicit theistic belief.

Belief in unseen order4/5

Its mission language treats truth-seeking, public service, and education as goods beyond narrow transaction or extraction.

Belief in revealed guidance2/5

The institution is not creed-based, but it does operate through statutes, plans, and formal ethical guidance.

Belief in prophets as examples2/5

Public exemplarity is civic and academic rather than prophetic, though student leaders sometimes play that moral role in practice.

Belief in accountability last day4/5

Transparency structures, public scrutiny, and student mobilization show a real accountability orientation in the institutional culture.

Contribution to Others

Helps relatives4/5

As Paraguay's main public university, UNA directly serves families and communities through large-scale professional formation.

Helps the poor or stuck4/5

Its public mission and the student defense of Arancel Cero point to a real concern for access, even if support outcomes are uneven.

Helps people who ask directly3/5

Extension work, public-information tools, and service units show practical help, but evidence is stronger on mission than on audited results.

Helps free people from constraint3/5

Education expands mobility and freedom, but governance failures and service inequalities limit the score.

Helps orphans or unsupported young people4/5

The university's core work is supporting large numbers of young adults through public higher education.

Helps travelers strangers or cut off people4/5

Official pages show international mobility and a national reach that serves people beyond a narrow local campus circle.

Personal Discipline

Prays consistently2/5

At institutional level this maps to disciplined ethical routine; the public record shows procedure and commitment rather than devotional practice.

Gives obligatory charity2/5

Its closest equivalent is extension and public educational service rather than explicit charitable redistribution.

Reliability

Keeps promises agreements contracts commitments and clear communication3/5

Formal governance and transparency have improved, but repeated scandals and faculty protests keep integrity at only a moderate level.

Stability Under Pressure

Patient during personal hardship4/5

The institution survived a major legitimacy crisis in 2015 without losing its basic national role.

Patient during financial difficulty3/5

Budget dependence and funding anxieties are visible, but the university continues operating at national scale.

Patient during conflict pressure fear or battlefield moments4/5

Student occupations, public controversy, and civic pressure have not broken the institution's continuity, and they have sometimes improved it.

Timeline

Key events and documented turning points

1889

Paraguay creates the National University of Asunción by law

The Law of Secondary and Higher Education created the university, which was then officially inaugurated in March 1890 as the country's principal public university.

A durable national public university was established.

high
2015

#UNANoTeCalles protests force a reckoning with rectorate corruption

Students occupied the campus and demanded an end to corruption and greater transparency after reporting exposed irregular appointments and payroll abuses linked to rectorate leadership.

The protests led to leadership resignations and permanently raised expectations for transparency and student voice.

high
2022

Rectorate transparency portal receives 100% compliance recognition

UNA launched a more structured rectorate transparency portal, and SENAC recognized it with full compliance after reviewing its content.

Public-information access and anti-corruption visibility improved at rectorate level.

medium
2024

Students occupy rectorate and faculties to defend Arancel Cero funding

Students maintained an indefinite campus takeover and vigils to defend tuition-free public university access and resist a funding shift they believed threatened the program.

The protests kept educational access and student welfare at the center of public debate.

high
2024

University Assembly reelects rector and vice rector for 2024-2029

The Asamblea Universitaria reelected Zully Vera de Molinas and Miguel Torres Ñumbay for a new five-year term through the university's formal electoral process.

Governance continuity was preserved under a documented electoral process.

medium
2024

Law faculty students protest alleged irregularities and lack of transparency

Students at the law faculty publicly accused leadership of poor management, lack of transparency, and putting private interests ahead of student welfare.

The dispute reinforced the view that governance quality remains uneven across constituent units.

medium

Pressure Tests

Behavior under crisis or scrutiny

2015 #UNANoTeCalles corruption crisis

2015

Students occupied campus and demanded accountability after corruption allegations around rectorate appointments and payroll abuse.

Response: The protests forced leadership change and made transparency a lasting public expectation, but they did not end all governance problems.

mixed_integrity_under_pressure

2024 Arancel Cero mobilization

2024

Students took the rectorate and multiple faculties to defend tuition-free public university access against funding threats.

Response: The institution remained functional while student pressure kept public-access concerns at the center of the university's moral story.

strong_social_care_under_pressure

2024 faculty transparency protests

2024

Law faculty students protested what they described as irregularities, poor management, and lack of transparency.

Response: The episode showed that internal scrutiny remains active, but also that local governance trust is still fragile.

mixed_integrity_under_pressure

Progression

crisis years

The 2015 corruption scandal exposed patronage and trust failures that damaged institutional integrity.

down

current stage

Transparency structures are stronger and civic pressure remains alive, but governance quality still looks uneven across faculties.

up

early years

Founding as Paraguay's national public university created a durable state-facing educational mission.

up

growth years

Expansion into the country's main public university deepened national reach and professional formation.

up

Strongest positives

  • Large-scale public education and professional formation for Paraguay.
  • Students and official reforms created real transparency pressure after 2015.

Key concerns

  • Enduring trust damage from corruption and patronage-linked governance failures.
  • Repeated disputes over student representation, transparency, and faculty management.

Behavioral Patterns

Positive

  • Large-scale public higher education and professional formation.
  • Visible extension and community-service commitments.
  • A more explicit transparency posture after the 2015 crisis.

Concerns

  • Corruption and patronage scandal at rectorate level in 2015.
  • Recurring faculty-level allegations of poor transparency or irregular management.
  • Uneven student-facing conditions and trust in administrative delivery.

Evidence Quality

6

Strong

4

Medium

0

Weak

Overall: broad

Evidence warnings

  • The public record is much stronger on governance conflict, scale, and formal transparency than on audited student-outcome or institution-wide remediation metrics.

This profile measures observable institutional behavior and public evidence, not hidden intentions or private beliefs.